Home » Selecting a Subcommittee

Deadlines

12 September 2017
Papers: Title, abstract, authors, subcommittee choice, and all other metadata

19 September 2017
Papers: Submission files

11 October 2017
Doctoral Consortium
Case Studies
Courses
Art Exhibition

13 October 2017
Workshops/Symposia

2 January 2018
Student Design Competition

15 January 2018
alt.chi
Career Development Day
Demonstrations
Late-Breaking Work
Panels & Fireside Chats
Special Interest Groups (SIGs)
Student Research Competition
Video Showcase

Selecting a Subcommittee

Overview

CHI 2018 anticipates more than 3,000 Papers submissions. The review process needs to handle this load while also providing high-quality reviews, which requires that each submission is handled by an expert Associate Chair (AC) who can recruit expert reviewers. The organization of the CHI program committee into topical subcommittees helps achieve this. See the description of the Papers review process for a detailed explanation of the responsibilities of the ACs and Subcommittee Chairs (SCs).

Authors are required to suggest a subcommittee to review your submission. This page provides guidance on choosing the appropriate subcommittees for your submission.

Subcommittee selection process

When you submit a Paper, you will designate two appropriate subcommittees for your submission. In the vast majority of cases, the subcommittee that will review your submission is one of the two subcommittees that you proposed. In cases where the Papers Chairs and/or Subcommittee Chairs recognize that your submission will be reviewed more thoroughly in another subcommittee, a submission may be transferred from one subcommittee to another. If a submission is transferred to another subcommittee, this will happen in the first week of the process, before reviewers are assigned; i.e., transferring will not affect a submission’s review process, it will only ensure that it receives the most complete, fair set of reviews.

Below, you will see a list of subcommittees and descriptions of the topics they are covering, the name of each SC, and the names of the ACs serving on each subcommittee. It is your responsibility to select the subcommittee that best matches the expertise needed to assess your research, and that you believe will most fully appreciate your contribution to the field of HCI.

CHI has traditionally supported diverse and interdisciplinary work and continues to expand into new topics not previously explored. We recognize that as a result, you may find more than two subcommittees which are plausible matches for your work. However, for a number of reasons it will be necessary for you to select no more than two target subcommittees, and you should strive to find the best matches based on what you think is the main contribution of your submission (examples of papers that are considered good matches are linked below for each subcommittee). You can also email the SCs for guidance if you are unsure (an email alias is provided below for each set of SCs).

Note that the scope of each subcommittee is not rigidly defined. Each has a broad mandate, and most subcommittees cover a collection of different topics. Further, SCs and ACs are all seasoned researchers, experienced with program committee review work, and each is committed to a process which seeks to assign each paper reviewers who are true experts in whatever the subject matter of the paper is. ACs recognize that many papers, or perhaps even most papers, will not perfectly fit the definition of their subcommittee’s scope. Consequently, papers will not be penalized or downgraded because they do not align perfectly with a particular subcommittee. Interdisciplinary, multi-topic, and cross-topic papers are encouraged, and will be carefully and professionally judged by all subcommittees.

In making a subcommittee choice you should make careful consideration of what the most central and salient contribution of your work is, even if there are several different contributions. As an example, let’s say you are writing a paper about Ergonomic Business Practices for the Elderly using Novel Input Devices. Perhaps this is a very new topic. It covers a lot of ground. It’s not an exact fit for any of the subcommittees, but several choices are plausible. To choose between them, you need to make a reasoned decision about the core contributions of your work. Should it be evaluated in terms of the usage context for the target user community? The novel methodology developed for your study? The system and interaction techniques you have developed? Each of these evaluation criteria may partially apply, but try to consider which is most central and which you most want to highlight for your readers. Also look at the subcommittees, the people who will serve on them, and the kind of work they have been associated with in the past. Even if there are several subcommittees that could offer fair and expert assessments of this work, go with the one that really fits the most important and novel contributions of your paper. That committee will be in the best position to offer constructive and expert review feedback on the contributions of your research.

Each subcommittee description also links to several recent CHI papers that the SCs feel are good examples of papers that fit scope of that subcommittee. Please look at these examples as a way to decide on the best subcommittee for your paper – but remember that these are just a few examples, and do not specify the full range of topics that would fit with any subcommittee.

List of the subcommittees

Subcommittees are listed and described below. Each has a title, short description, and an indication of who will Chair and serve on the subcommittee. Subcommittees have been constructed with an eye to maintaining logically coherent clusters of topics.

 

User Experience and Usability

This subcommittee is suitable for papers that extend the knowledge, practices, methods, components, and tools that make technology more useful, usable, and desirable. Successful papers will present results, practical approaches, tools, technologies, and research methods that demonstrably advance our understanding, design, and evaluation of user experience and/or usability. The focus is on usability and user experience of widely used technologies with contributions being judged substantially on the basis of their demonstrable potential for effective reuse and applicability across a range of application domains or across a range of design, research, and user communities.

Subcommittee Chairs:

Siân Lindley, Microsoft Research
Kasper Hornbaek, University of Copenhagen

Contact: sc.ux@chi2018.acm.org

Associate Chairs:

  1. Andres Lucero, University of Southern Denmark
  2. Harald Reiterer, University of Konstanz
  3. Morten Fjeld, Chalmers University of Technology
  4. Julie R. Williamson, University of Glasgow
  5. Effie L-C Law, University of Leicester
  6. Corina Sas, Lancaster University
  7. Parisa Eslambolchilar, Cardiff University
  8. Lynne Baillie, Heriot-Watt University
  9. Amanda Lee Hughes, Utah State University
  10. Magy Seif El-Nasr, Northeastern University
  11. Joe Tullio, Google
  12. Keith Vertanen, Michigan Technological University
  13. Erin Cherry, Northrop Grumman Mission Systems
  14. Florian Alt, University of Munich
  15. Katharina Reinecke, University of Washington, USA
  16. Enrico Rukzio, Ulm University, Germany
  17. Elisa Mekler, University of Basel
  18. Martin Pielot, Telefonica
  19. Sari Kujala, Aalto University, Finland
  20. Frank Betley, Yahoo
  21. Joel Fischer, University of Nottingham
  22. Jettie Hoonhout, Phillips Research
  23. Azam Khan, Autodesk Research

Example Papers:

 

Specific Applications Areas

This subcommittee is suitable for  papers that extend the design and understanding of applications for specific application areas or domains of interest to the HCI community, yet not explicitly covered by another subcommittee. Example application areas and user groups are listed below. Submissions will be evaluated in part based on their impact on the specific application area and/or group that they address, in addition to their impact on HCI.

Example user groups: children, families, people in developing countries, employees, charities and third sector organisations

Example application areas: education, home, sustainability, ICT4D, creativity

Subcommittee Chairs:

June Ahn, New York University
Amy Ogan, Carnegie Mellon University
Christ Quintana, University of Michigan
Steven Drucker, Microsoft Research
Nicola Dell, Cornell Tech.

Contact: sc.specApps@chi2018.acm.org

Associate Chairs:

  1. Lisa Anthony
  2. Alexis Hiniker
  3. Juho Kim
  4. Betsy DiSalvo
  5. Eleanor O’Rourke
  6. Joseph Jay Williams
  7. Jason Yip
  8. Tammy Clegg
  9. Erin Walker
  10. Sayamindu Dasgupta
  11. Michael Horn
  12. Elizabeth Bonsignore
  13. Brian DeRenzi
  14. Susan Wyche
  15. Joyojeet Pal
  16. Tawanna Dillahunt
  17. Mike Hazas
  18. Adrian Clear
  19. Celine Latulipe
  20. Lyn Bartram
  21. Shamsi Iqbal
  22. Robert Comber
  23. Jacki O’Neill

Example Papers:
TBA

Interaction Beyond the Individual

This subcommittee is suitable for papers that contribute to our understanding of collaborative technologies for groups, organizations, communities, and networks. Successful submissions will advance knowledge, theories, and insights from the social, psychological, behavioral, and organizational practice that arise from technology use in various contexts. This subcommittee is also suitable for submissions describing  collaborative or crowdsourcing tools or systems.

Subcommittee Chairs:

Kate Starbird, University of Washington
Brent Hecht, University of Minnesota
Jeff Nichols, Google
Luigina Ciolfi, Sheffield Hallam University

Contact: sc.cscw@chi2018.acm.org

Associate Chairs:

  1. Airi Lampinen, Stockholm University
  2. Alice Oh, KAIST
  3. Brian Keegan, UC Boulder
  4. Irina Shklovski, IT Copenhagen
  5. Victoria Sosik, Google
  6. Sheena Erete, DePaul University, Erete
  7. Haiyi Zhu, University of Minnesota
  8. David McDonald, University of Washington
  9. Justin Cranshaw, Microsoft Research
  10. Alex Leavitt, Facebook
  11. Uichin Lee, KAIST
  12. Lydia Chilton, Columbia
  13. Oded Nov, NYU
  14. Casey Dugan, IBM
  15. Scott Robertson, Univ. Hawaii
  16. Aleksandra Sarcevic, Drexel University
  17. Naja Holten Moller, University of Copenhagen
  18. Susan Fussell, Cornell University
  19. Alexander Boden, Fraunhofer-FIT
  20. Carman Neustadter, Simon Fraser University
  21. Yla Tausczik, University of Maryland
  22. Munmun De Choudhury, Georgia Tech
  23. Katie Pine, Arizona State University
  24. Dakuo Wang, IBM Research
  25. Claudia Mueller, University of Siegen
  26. Jason Wiese, University of Utah
  27. Michael Koch, Universitat der Bundeswehr Munich
  28. Thomas Ludwig, University of Siegen
  29. Sharoda Paul, Facebook

Example Papers:
TBA

Games and Play

This subcommittee is suitable for papers across all areas of playful interaction, player experience, and games. Examples of topics include: game interaction and interfaces, playful systems (toys, books, and leisure), the design and development of games (including serious games and gamification), player experience evaluation (player psychology, games user research, and game analytics), the study of player and developer communities, and understanding play.

Subcommittee Chairs:

Katherine Isbister, University of California, Santa Cruz
Lennart Nacke, University of Waterloo

Contact: sc.games@chi2018.acm.org

Associate Chairs:

  1. Zachary O. Toups, New Mexico State University
  2. Pejman Mirza-Babaei, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT)
  3. Gillian Smith, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
  4. Rilla Khaled, Department of Design and Computation Arts, Faculty of Fine Arts, Concordia University
  5. Erik Andersen, Cornell University
  6. Katharina Spiel, Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien)
  7. Elizabeth Bonsignore, College of Information Studies/Human-Computer Interaction Lab, University of Maryland
  8. Sebastian Deterding, Digital Creativity Labs, University of York
  9. Regina Bernhaupt, Ruwido Austria
  10. Carmelo Ardito, Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro
  11. Annika Waern, Uppsala University
  12. Guenter Wallner, University of Applied Arts Vienna
  13. Brian Magerko, Georgia Tech
  14. Elizabeth Veinott, Michigan Technological University

Example Papers:
TBA

Privacy, Security and Visualization

This subcommittee is suitable for papers across all areas of usable privacy, security, data visualization and visual analytics. This includes but is not limited to new techniques/systems/technologies, evaluations of existing/new systems, ground work identifying important insights for the community, and lessons learned from real-world deployments.

Submissions will be judged based on the contribution they make to privacy, security, visualization or a combination of those as well as their impact on HCI. For example, papers that focus on technical contributions need to show how these relate to humans and user experience.

Subcommittee Chairs:

Jason Hong, Carnegie Mellon University
Nathalie Henry Riche, Microsoft Research

Contact: sc.priViz@chi2018.acm.org

Associate Chairs:

  1. Niklas Elmqvist, University of Maryland
  2. Benjamin Bach, University of Edinburgh
  3. Miguel Nacenta, University of St-Andrews
  4. Melanie Tory, Tableau Research
  5. Apu Kapadia, University of Indiana, Bloomington
  6. Marc Langheinrich, University of Lugano
  7. Janne Lindqvist, Rutgers University
  8. Serge Egelman, University of California at Berkeley
  9. Florian Schaub, University of Michigan
  10. Ilaria Liccardi, MIT
  11. Bart P. Knijnenburg, Clemson University
  12. Marshini Chetty, Princeton University
  13. Manya Sleeper, Google
  14. John Stasko, Georgia Tech
  15. Anastasia Bezerianos, University Paris-Sud
  16. Miriah Meyer, University of Utah
  17. Shixia Liu, Tsinghua University
  18. Zicheng (Leo) Liu, Adobe
  19. Sameer Patil, Indiana University
  20. Michael McGuffin, Ecole de Technologie Superieure
  21. Yang Wang, Syracuse University

 

Example Papers:
TBA

Health, Accessibility and Aging

The “health” component of this subcommittee is suitable for contributions related to health, wellness, and medicine, including physical, mental, and emotional well-being, clinical environments, self-management, and everyday wellness. The “accessibility and aging” subcommittee is suitable for contributions related to accessibility for people with disabilities and/or technology for and studies involving older adults (i.e., senior citizens). Accessibility papers are those that deal with technology design for or use by people with disabilities including sensory, motor, and cognitive impairments. We have indicated below which ACs will handle the “health” papers and which will handle “accessibility and aging”; please add the keyword “health,” “accessibility,” or “aging” as appropriate to your submission in PCS so that we can be sure to direct your submission to the appropriate subset of this committee. Note that if your paper primarily concerns interactions of older adults with their healthcare providers, then the Health keyword is probably a better fit, whereas papers reflecting on how older adults use technologies and/or designing interfaces and interactions suited to the needs of older adults are better suited for the accessibility and aging component of this committee. We strongly suggest that authors review this Accessible Writing Guide in order to adopt a writing style that refers to stakeholder groups using appropriate terminology. Submissions to this subcommittee will be evaluated in part based on their inclusion of and potential impact on their target user groups and other stakeholders. This subcommittee balances the rigor required in all CHI submissions with awareness of the challenges of conducting research in these important areas. This subcommittee welcomes all contributions related to health, accessibility, and aging, including empirical, theoretical, conceptual, methodological, design, and systems contributions.

Example Papers (Health):

Example Papers (Accessibility and Aging):

Subcommittee Chairs:

Katie Siek, Indiana University
Sean Munson, University of Washington
Meredith Ringel Morris, Microsoft Research
Jeffrey Bigham, Carnegie Mellon University

Contact: sc.aha@chi2018.acm.org

Associate Chairs:

  1. Rosa Arriaga, Georgia Tech University
  2. Timothy Bickmore, Northeastern
  3. Hao-Hua Chu, National Taiwan University
  4. David Coyle, University College Dublin
  5. Mayank Goel, Carnegie Mellon University
  6. Andrea Hartzler, Kaiser Permanente
  7. Eric Hekler, Arizona State University
  8. Amanda Lazar, University of Maryland
  9. Matthew Lee, FXPAL
  10. Marilyn Lennon, University of Strathclyde
  11. Leslie Liu, Motorola
  12. Gabriela Marcu, Drexel University
  13. Lena Mamykina, Columbia
  14. Laura Pina, University of Washington
  15. Madhu Reddy, Northwestern University
  16. Stephen Schueller, Northwestern University
  17. Patrick Shih, Indiana University Bloomington
  18. Tiffany Veinot, University of Michigan
  19. Lauren Wilcox, Georgia Tech
  20. Maria Wolters, University of Edinburgh
  21. Robin Brewer, University of Michigan
  22. Shaun Kane, University of Colorado
  23. Kyle Rector, University of Iowa
  24. Richard Ladner, University of Washington
  25. Stacy Branham, University of Maryland Baltimore County
  26. Shari Trewin, IBM Research
  27. Khai Truong, University of Toronto
  28. Walter Lasecki, University of Michigan
  29. Shiri Azenkot, Cornell Tech
  30. Anke Brock, INRIA
  31. Tiago Guerreiro, University of Lisbon
  32. Erin Brady, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
  33. Kristen Shinohara, Rochester Institute of Technology

Example Papers:
TBA

Design

This subcommittee is suitable for papers that make a significant designerly contribution to HCI. Papers submitted here include novel designs of interactive products, services, or systems that advance the state of the art; creation and evaluation of new design tools, processes, methods, or principles, including those that explore alternatives to scientistic ways of knowing; work that expands the scope of design thinking within HCI research or practice; work that applies perspectives from other disciplines to inspire or to critique the design of interactive things; or work that advances knowledge on the human activity of design as it relates to HCI research or practice. We particularly encourage contributions of new designs that broaden the boundaries of interaction design and promote new aesthetic and sociocultural possibilities. Examples of design approaches include : industrial/product design, visual/information design, participatory design, user-centered design, interaction design, user interface design, user experience design, service design, critical design, and design fictions. Finally, this committee encourages submission of work that addresses design research issues such as aesthetics, values, effects (such as emotion), methods, practices, critique, constructive design research, and design theory.

Subcommittee Chairs:
Kristina Höök, SICS
John Zimmerman, Carnegie Mellon University
Youn-kyung Lim, KAIST
William Gaver, University of London

Contact: sc.design@chi2018.acm.org

Associate Chairs:

  1. Marianne Graves Petersen, Aarhus University
  2. Steve Harrison, Virginia Tech
  3. Sun Young Park, University of Michigan
  4. Oren Zuckerman, IDC Herzliya
  5. Abigail Durrant, Newcastle University
  6. Giulio Jacucci, University of Helsinki
  7. William Odom, Simon Fraser University
  8. Ambra Trotto, RISE Interactive
  9. Masa Inakage, Keio University
  10. Silvia Lindtner, University of Michigan
  11. Jodi Forlizzi, CMU
  12. Dan Lockton, CMU,
  13. David Philip Green, Northumbria University
  14. Lone Koefoed Hansen, Aarhus University
  15. Ron Wakkary, Simon Fraser and TU/e
  16. Eric Paulos, University of California, Berkeley
  17. Madeline Balaam, Newcastle University
  18. Anna Stahl, RISE SICS
  19. Zhiyong Fu, Tsinghua University
  20. Ian Oakley, UNIST
  21. Tom Jenkins, GTU
  22. Kristina Andersen, STEIM
  23. John Vines, Northumbria University
  24. Scott Davidoff, NASA
  25. Peter Krogh, Aarhus University
  26. Florian ‘Floyd’ Mueller, RMIT University
  27. Andrea Bianchi, KAIST
  28. Mark Blythe, Northumbria University
  29. James Pierce, UC Berkeley

Example Papers:
TBA

Interaction Techniques, Devices, and Modalities

This subcommittee focuses on advances in interaction and enabling technologies, as well as , explorations of emergent computing domains and experiences. It welcomes contributions that are fundamentally new, those  that examine capabilities/modalities that have not yet been fully exploited, as well as those which describe substantive improvements on prior work that open new interactive possibilities. Contributions will be judged in part based on their novelty or on their demonstrated improvements. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to: software interaction techniques, touch and gestural input, haptic and tangible interfaces, 3D interaction, augmented/mixed/virtual reality, wearable and on-body computing, sensors and sensing, displays and actuators, muscle- and brain-computer interfaces, and auditory and speech interfaces.

Subcommittee Chairs:
Anne Roudaut, University of Bristol
Dan Ashbrook, Rochester Institute of Technology
Dan Vogel, University of Waterloo
Fanny Chevalier, Inria

Contact: sc.tech@chi2018.acm.org

Associate Chairs:

  1. Gilles Bailly, CNRS / Paris Sorbonne
  2. Stephanie Mueller, MIT
  3. Diego Martinez, University Sussex
  4. Michelle Annett, MishMashMakers
  5. Oussama Metatla, University of Bristol
  6. Steven Feiner, Columbia University
  7. Raf Ramakers, Hasselt University
  8. Justin Matejka, Autodesk Research
  9. Radu-Daniel Vatavu, University Stefan cel Mare of Suceava
  10. Carl Gutwin, University of Saskatchewan
  11. Xiaojun Bi, Stony Brook University
  12. Wendy Mackay, Inria
  13. Liwei Chan, National Taiwan University
  14. David Holman, Tactual Labs
  15. Eduardo Veloso, University of Melbourne
  16. Aaron Quigley, University of St Andrews
  17. Jessica cauchard, IDC Herzliya
  18. Ehud Sharlin, University of Calgary
  19. Hans Gellersen, Lancaster University
  20. Gonzalo Ramos, Microsoft Research
  21. Shengdong Zhao, National University of Singapore
  22. Theophanis Tsandilas, Inria
  23. Andreas Bulling, Max Planck Institute
  24. Eve Hoggan, Aarhus University
  25. Ken Hinckley, Microsoft Research
  26. Gery Casiez, Universite de Lille
  27. Yvonne Jansen, CNRS / Paris Sorbonne
  28. Nicolai Marquardt, UCL
  29. Xing-Dong Yang, Dartmouth
  30. Ed Lank, University of Waterloo
  31. Sebastian Boring, University of Copenhagen
  32. Mark Billinghurst, University of South Australia
  33. Sylvain Malacria, Inria
  34. Joanna Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, U. Copenhagen
  35. Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Autodesk Research
  36. Hrvoje Benko, Microsoft Research
  37. Sophie Stellmach, Microsoft Research
  38. Jens Grubert, Coburg University
  39. Derek Reilly, Dalhousie University
  40. Aakar Gupta, University of Toronto

Example Papers:

TBA

Understanding People: Theory, Concepts, Methods

This subcommittee is suitable for papers whose primary contribution improves our understanding of people or interactional contexts. This understanding may be derived from quantitative or qualitative empirical research, or it may be conceptual in nature. Suitable topics for the subcommittee include but are not limited to individual behavior, human performance, as well as group, social, and collaborative behaviors. Core contributions typically take the form of insightful findings, evolved theories, models, concepts, or methods. Contributions will be judged in part by their rigor, significance, validity, and practical or theoretical impact.

Subcommittee Chairs:
Duncan Brumby, University College London
Tovi Grossman, Autodesk
Wendy Ju, Stanford University
Hao-Chuan Wang, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan

Contact: sc.people@chi2018.acm.org

Associate Chairs:

  1. Fraser Anderson, Autodesk Research
  2. Eytan Adar, University of Michigan
  3. Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, University of Toronto
  4. Nikola Banovic, Carnegie Mellon University
  5. Pam Briggs, Northumbria University
  6. Ben Cowan, University College Dublin
  7. Niels Henze, University of Stuttgart
  8. Anthony Hornof, University of Oregon
  9. Gary Hsieh, University of Washington
  10. Chris Janssen, Utrecht University
  11. Matthew Kay, University of Michigan
  12. Neha Kumar, Georgia Tech
  13. Andrew Kun, University of New Hampshire
  14. Shaun Lawson, Northumbria University
  15. Yang Li, Google
  16. Gloria Mark, University of California, Irvine
  17. Donald McMillan, Stockholm University
  18. Grace Ngai, Hong Kong Polytechnic University
  19. Aisling O’Kane, University of Bristol
  20. Sean Rintel, Microsoft Research
  21. Simon Robinson, Swansea University
  22. Antti Salovaara, University of Helsinki
  23. Orit Shaer, Wellesley College
  24. Yuan-Chi Tseng, National Cheng Kung University
  25. Jeremy Frey
  26. Helena Mentis, University of Maryland
  27. Nicholas Ward, University of Montana
  28. Malte Jung, Cornell
  29. Min Kyung Lee, CMU
  30. Christopher Frauenberger
  31. Ronald Schroeter, QUT
  32. Naomi Yamashita, NTT
  33. Xiaojuan Ma, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
  34. Tony Tang, University of Calgary
  35. Jennifer Marlow, FXPAL,
  36. Norman Su, Indiana University
  37. Paul Luff, King’s College London
  38. Wai-Tat Fu, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
  39. Bryan Semaan, Syracuse University
  40. Tesh Goyal, Google
  41. Vera Liao, IBM Research
  42. Ge Gao, Cornell University
  43. Michael Muller, IBM Research
  44. Shaomei Wu, Facebook Research
  45. Lora Oehlberg, University of Calgary,
  46. Jamy Li, University of Twente
  47. Hideaki Kuzuoka, University of Tsukuba

Example Papers:
TBA

Engineering Interactive Systems and Technologies

This subcommittee is suitable for papers focusing on systems, engineering, and technology contributions that improve, advance, or enable interaction. This will include tools, methods, and languages for construction and engineering of interactive systems, as well as software and hardware technologies that enable and demonstrate novel interactive capabilities.

Engineering contributions should clearly demonstrate how they address interactive systems concerns such as, for example, scalability, reliability, interoperability, testing, and performance. They can be targeted at end users, offering novel interaction capabilities or supporting improved interactions. They can also be targeted at developers, improving or facilitating the construction of innovative interactive systems.

Subcommittee Chairs:

Emmanuel Pietriga, Inria
Jennifer Mankoff, Carnegie Mellon University

Contact: sc.systems@chi2018.acm.org

Associate Chairs:

  1. Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Univ. Paris-Sud
  2. David Karger, MIT
  3. Parmit Chilana, Simon Fraser University
  4. Antonio Kruger, DFKI
  5. Steve Oney, Univ. of Michigan
  6. Andy Wilson, Microsoft Research
  7. Kimiko Riokai, UC Berkeley
  8. Gierad Laput, Carnegie Mellon University
  9. Karon MacLean, University of British Columbia
  10. Patrick Baudisch, Hasso Plattner Institute
  11. Ranjitha Kumar, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  12. Marcos Serrano, IRIT
  13. Lining Yao, Carnegie Mellon University
  14. Lars Erik Holmquist, Northumbria University
  15. Polo Chau, Georgia Tech
  16. Jan Borchers, RWTH Aachen University
  17. Elena Glassman, UC Berkeley
  18. Michael Nebeling, Univ. of Michigan

Example Papers:
TBA

Scroll Up